Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP)

Abstract

Since its inception in FY 1990, this program element has been used to fund the development of critically needed, high priority Test and Evaluation (T&E) capabilities for joint/multi-Service requirements. The Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) uses a corporate investment approach to combine Service, Defense, and other government agencies T&E needs, maximize opportunities for joint efforts, and avoid unwarranted duplication of test capabilities. CTEIP focuses investments on projects that will have high productivity returns on investment. Projects under the CTEIP Program Element (PE) support two basic tasks: investments to improve the test capabilities base (Joint Improvement and Modernization (JIM) projects) and development of near-term solutions to test capability shortfalls in support of ongoing operational test programs (Resource Enhancement Project (REP)). The JIM funds critically needed T&E investments in the major functional areas of: air combat; armament and munitions; Command, Control Communication, Computer and Intelligence (C4I) and networks; common range instrumentation; electronic combat; land combat; sea combat; space combat; target systems; and test environments. Examples of project subject matter include: highly accurate time-space-position information, network enhanced telemetry, miniaturized flight safety systems, realistic urban test environments, ground testing for hypersonic systems and satellites, and end-to-end testing of infrared countermeasure systems. CTEIP continues as the focal point for fostering common architectures throughout the test and training communities to enhance the sharing of resources and links between test and training ranges. CTEIP has provided special focus to institutionalize the use of modeling and simulation (M&S) as a practical test tool; to link ranges through internetting to enhance inter-range and inter-Service cooperation and resource sharing; and, to ensure development and acquisition of common instrumentation necessary for a more efficient test infrastructure. Analyses of alternative solutions are conducted for each investment project to validate T&E requirements, to define integrated support systems, and to determine overall cost effectiveness of the proposed test investments. The use of Department of Defense (DoD)-wide criteria for requirement validation, prioritization, and risk assessment ensures an effective test resource investment program. The REP funds development of near-term solutions for critical ongoing operational tests supporting decisions on major, high priority defense acquisition programs. These unanticipated operational test (OT) capability requirements arise from several sources such as a new threat system identified during OT planning, acquisition of foreign military assets that are critical in determining weapon system operational effectiveness, short timelines between system design maturity and scheduled OT, and emerging technologies and test requirements resulting from operational concept changes mandated by Congress or Director, Operational Test & Evaluation (DOT&E), or system-of-systems testing. Funding these activities under the CTEIP provides the opportunity to coordinate and integrate these near-term test requirements with the total DoD test and evaluation investment planning, and ensures their availability and legacy for other programs that may have similar testing requirements. This Research Category 6.4 PE includes special studies, analyses, and strategic planning related to test capabilities and infrastructure, and supports the development and application of proven technologies to provide major test and evaluation capabilities required to meet DoD component weapon system test requirements.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
R2 Budgetary Justification
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2012
Source ID
0604940D8Z_6_0400_PB_2012
Change Summary Explanation
• Improving DoD Business Operations. As part of the Department of Defense reform agenda, implemented a review of the organization to align resources to the most critical priorities and eliminate lower priority functions. (FY 2012: $-2.959) • Efficiency and Enhancement Initiatives- Overhead Reductions. As part of the Department of Defense reform agenda, reduced funds needed for contractor support through increased efficiency and elimination of lower priority requirements (FY 2012: $-1.618) • Program Execution Adjustment. Internal Departmental realignment of funds to meet higher priority needs (FY 2012: $20.000)
Service Agency Name
Office of Secretary Of Defense

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Department Of Defense
  • Efficiency
  • Governments
  • Infrared Countermeasures
  • Investments
  • Land Warfare
  • Military Acquisition
  • Operational Effectiveness
  • Simulations
  • System Of Systems
  • Teamwork
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Warfare
  • Weapon Systems

Fields of Study

  • Engineering

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering.
  • Aerospace Test and Evaluation
  • Defense Acquisition Program Management

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control
  • Hypersonics
  • Microelectronics
  • Space

Related Documents