Survivability/Lethality Analysis

Abstract

This Program Element (PE) funds analytical products necessary for the inherently-governmental Army Test & Evaluation Command/Army Evaluation Center (ATEC/AEC) mission. Products result from investigating, analyzing, assessing, and reporting on the survivability of Soldiers, and on the survivability, lethality and vulnerability (SLV) of the highest-priority Army systems, whether those systems are employed during stability, support, defensive, or offensive missions. While the Army is at war, analytical results funded by this PE are also directly leveraged for survivability support to current operations. Developed through measurement, experiment, test support, and modeling and simulation (M&S), ATEC uses the products funded by this PE in many ways to make the Army force more survivable. This PE provides quantitative lethality and survivability analyses and data for fielded and developmental systems as the Army makes the required choices to transform into a modular Brigade Combat Team (BCT) based organization. Products concern: Army fire support systems, direct fire munitions; Army air defense and missile defense systems; Army aviation systems including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; network communications and other network enabled battle command and communication systems; and selected joint services systems particularly relevant to the Army's joint and expeditionary role. Products also include analysis and data concerning individual Soldier items, including protective equipment such as helmets and vests. These survivability products are leveraged into rapid-equipping initiatives and other technical support for operational forces involved in the current fight. Continued development of these products also guarantees preservation of the Army's vitally-needed technical corporate memory for expert survivability advice. Survivability analyses funded by this PE are conducted across the spectrum of battlefield threats to include: guns, missiles, mines and other methods of inflicting physical damage; jammers, countermeasures, and other electronic warfare techniques; Cybersecurity and computer network operations; and directed energy weapons. This survivability information enables developers, users, and decision makers to perform credible survivability tradeoffs for both Soldiers and materiel. These technical survivability details enable properly informed decisions concerning systems and tactics that maximize both the combat power and survivability of Army forces. Survivability data and analysis results funded by this PE are efficiently leveraged for many different Army uses, reducing total cost to the Army by eliminating the need for duplicative capabilities funded by individual system developers. Central funding of this mission assures the Army accurate and consistent treatment of survivability across all classes of systems, across all formal system Evaluations, and across the Army's Army Regulation (AR) 5-5 studies process. Work program is prioritized principally by the ATEC/AEC and is used by them in the Army's formal Evaluation process in such a way that ATEC can comply with its legally-mandated responsibility to assess system survivability along with effectiveness and suitability. Program Managers (PM) and the Program Executive Officers (PEO) use the survivability analyses and data funded by this PE to make design decisions that are optimized for survivability, to direct specific weapon system development efforts that are needed for survivability enhancement, and to structure product improvement programs. Soldier survivability data and analysis is leveraged to support the survivability portion of the Headquarters' Department of the Army (HQDA) Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel (G1) Human Systems Integration (HSI) program. United States (U.S.) Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) combat developers exploit the survivability products funded by this PE to initiate and improve survivability/lethality requirements, and to develop and refine doctrine and tactics. Also, the quantitative analytical results funded by the PE are leveraged as core inputs to formal AR 5-5 studies and other studies as directed by Army leaders. Finally, for particularly urgent or controversial survivability issues, data and analysis funded by this PE are used directly by senior Army decision makers to assure technically sound program/production decisions. This PE also supports Cybersecurity survivability analysis of Army battle command/networked systems as well as Army network architectures and technology. Supports ATEC and other electronic warfare vulnerability testers and evaluators by developing and providing highly technical specialized field countermeasure environments that threat forces may employ against Army communications networks, air defense and other systems. In conjunction with PMs and Army intelligence agencies, this PE also analyzes technical vulnerabilities of foreign weapons, network related systems, and intelligence Electronic Warfare (EW) systems to U.S. Army EW systems.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
R2 Budgetary Justification
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2019
Source ID
0605604A_6_2040_PB_2019
Change Summary Explanation
Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 increase of $7.155M is the result of a technical requirement update for modernization investments in combination with revised civilian pay and inflation rate assumptions.
Service Agency Name
Army

Entities

Organizations

  • United States Army

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Cyber
  • Electronic Warfare
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Aircrafts
  • Army Training
  • Communication Systems
  • Computer Networks
  • Cybersecurity
  • Defense Systems
  • Directed Energy Weapons
  • Electronic Warfare
  • Human Systems Integration
  • Munitions
  • Network Architecture
  • System Of Systems
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States
  • Warfare
  • Weapon Systems

Fields of Study

  • Computer science

Readers

  • Enterprise Information Systems Architecture and Joint Command Capability Interoperability Support.
  • Military Science and Technology Research and Modernization.

Technology Areas

  • Autonomy
  • Autonomy - UAVs
  • Cyber
  • Directed Energy
  • Microelectronics

Related Documents