Using sensory discrimination in a foraging-style task to evaluate human upper-limb sensorimotor performance

Abstract

Object stiffness discrimination is fundamental to shaping the way we interact with our environment. Investigating the sensorimotor mechanisms underpinning stiffness discrimination may help further our understanding of healthy and sensory-impaired upper limb function. We developed a metric that leverages sensory discrimination techniques and a foraging-based analysis to characterize participant accuracy and discrimination processes of sensorimotor control. Our metric required searching and discriminating two variants of test-object: rubber blocks and spring cells, which emphasized cutaneous-force and proprioceptive feedback, respectively. We measured the number of test-objects handled, selection accuracy, and foraging duration. These values were used to derive six indicators of performance. We observed higher discrimination accuracies, with quicker search and handling durations, for blocks compared to spring cells. Correlative analyses of accuracy, error rates, and foraging times suggested that the block and spring variants were, in fact, unique sensory tasks. These results provide evidence that our metric is sensitive to the contributions of sensory feedback, motor control, and task performance strategy, and will likely be effective in further characterizing the impact of sensory feedback on motor control in healthy and sensory-impaired populations.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Apr 09, 2019
Source ID
10.1038/s41598-019-42086-0

Entities

People

  • Dylan T Beckler
  • Jonathon S Schofield
  • Paul D Marasco
  • Zachary C Thumser

Organizations

  • United States Department of Defense

Tags

Fields of Study

  • Biology

Readers

  • Computational Modeling and Simulation
  • Robotics and Automation.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.