Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person

Abstract

Stress can impact perception, especially during use-of-force. Research efforts can thus advance both theory and practice by examining how perception during use-of-force might drive behavior. The current study explored the relationship between perceptual judgments and performance during novel close-combat training. Analyses included perceptual judgments from close-combat assessments conducted pre-training and post-training that required realistic use-of-force decisions in addition to an artificially construed stress-inoculation event used as a training exercise. Participants demonstrated significant reductions in situational awareness while under direct fire, which correlated to increased physiological stress. The initial likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person predicted the perceptual shortcomings of later stress-inoculation training. Subsequently, likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person was reduced following the stress-inoculation training. These preliminary findings have several implications for low or zero-cost solutions that might help trainers identify individuals who are underprepared for field responsibilities.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Jun 25, 2021
Source ID
10.1038/s41598-021-90918-9

Entities

People

  • Adam T. Biggs
  • Andrew E. Jensen
  • Dale A. Hirsch
  • Greg H. Huffman
  • Jayson Rhoton
  • Joel Suss
  • Joseph A. Hamilton
  • Karen R. Kelly
  • Rachel R Markwald
  • Sarah Sherwood
  • Timothy L. Dunn

Organizations

  • Office of Naval Research

Tags

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Munitions and Ordnance Engineering
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.