Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact

Abstract

Throughout history, a relatively small number of individuals have made a profound and lasting impact on science and society. Despite long-standing, multi-disciplinary interests in understanding careers of elite scientists, there have been limited attempts for a quantitative, career-level analysis. Here, we leverage a comprehensive dataset we assembled, allowing us to trace the entire career histories of nearly all Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine over the past century. We find that, although Nobel laureates were energetic producers from the outset, producing works that garner unusually high impact, their careers before winning the prize follow relatively similar patterns to those of ordinary scientists, being characterized by hot streaks and increasing reliance on collaborations. We also uncovered notable variations along their careers, often associated with the Nobel Prize, including shifting coauthorship structure in the prize-winning work, and a significant but temporary dip in the impact of work they produce after winning the Nobel Prize. Together, these results document quantitative patterns governing the careers of scientific elites, offering an empirical basis for a deeper understanding of the hallmarks of exceptional careers in science.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2020
Source ID
10.1098/rsif.2020.0135

Entities

People

  • Dashun Wang
  • Jichao Li
  • Santo Fortunato
  • Yian Yin

Organizations

  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  • Indiana University
  • National Science Foundation
  • National University of Defense Technology
  • Northwestern University

Tags

Fields of Study

  • Physics

Readers

  • Academic Conference Management
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design