Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus

Abstract

Animal acoustic communication often takes the form of complex sequences, made up of multiple distinct acoustic units. Apart from the well‐known example of birdsong, other animals such as insects, amphibians, and mammals (including bats, rodents, primates, and cetaceans) also generate complex acoustic sequences. Occasionally, such as with birdsong, the adaptive role of these sequences seems clear (e.g. mate attraction and territorial defence). More often however, researchers have only begun to characterise – let alone understand – the significance and meaning of acoustic sequences. Hypotheses abound, but there is little agreement as to how sequences should be defined and analysed. Our review aims to outline suitable methods for testing these hypotheses, and to describe the major limitations to our current and near‐future knowledge on questions of acoustic sequences. This review and prospectus is the result of a collaborative effort between 43 scientists from the fields of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution, signal processing, machine learning, quantitative linguistics, and information theory, who gathered for a 2013 workshop entitled, ‘Analysing vocal sequences in animals’. Our goal is to present not just a review of the state of the art, but to propose a methodological framework that summarises what we suggest are the best practices for research in this field, across taxa and across disciplines. We also provide a tutorial‐style introduction to some of the most promising algorithmic approaches for analysing sequences. We divide our review into three sections: identifying the distinct units of an acoustic sequence, describing the different ways that information can be contained within a sequence, and analysing the structure of that sequence. Each of these sections is further subdivided to address the key questions and approaches in that area. We propose a uniform, systematic, and comprehensive approach to studying sequences, with the goal of clarifying research terms used in different fields, and facilitating collaboration and comparative studies. Allowing greater interdisciplinary collaboration will facilitate the investigation of many important questions in the evolution of communication and sociality.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Nov 26, 2014
Source ID
10.1111/brv.12160

Entities

People

  • Alex Piel
  • Amiyaal Ilany
  • Arik Kershenbaum
  • Bernard Lohr
  • Brenda McCowan
  • Charles T Taylor
  • Chenghui Ju
  • Chloé Huetz
  • Cristiane Cäsar
  • Daniel T. Blumstein
  • Dezhe Z. Jin
  • Edgar E. Vallejo
  • Eduardo Mercado Iii
  • Ellen C. Garland
  • Gerald Carter
  • Gregory Backus
  • Heidi E. Harley
  • Jeremy Karnowski
  • Julia Hyland Bruno
  • Kazutoshi Sasahara
  • Kirsten M. Bohn
  • Laela S Sayigh
  • Laurance Doyle
  • Marie A. Roch
  • Mark A. Bee
  • Marta B. Manser
  • Megan Rice
  • Melissa Hughes
  • Michael Coen
  • Michael J. Johnson
  • Morgan Gustison
  • Peter M. Narins
  • Ramon Ferrer‐i‐cancho
  • Roberta Salmi
  • Sara Waller
  • Shimon Edelman
  • Stacy L. DeRuiter
  • Todd M. Freeberg
  • Veronica Zamora‐gutierrez
  • Yan Cao
  • Yu Shiu
  • Çağlar Akçay

Organizations

  • California State University San Marcos
  • College of Charleston
  • Cornell University
  • Florida International University
  • Hunter College
  • Marquette University
  • Ministry of Science of Spain
  • Montana State University
  • Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education
  • Nagoya University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • National Research Council
  • National Science Foundation
  • New College of Florida
  • North Carolina State University
  • Office of Naval Research
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Polytechnic University of Catalonia
  • Queens College
  • SETI Institute
  • San Diego State University
  • University College London
  • University at Buffalo
  • University of California, Davis
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Georgia
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Paris-Sud
  • University of St Andrews
  • University of Tennessee
  • University of Texas at Dallas
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • University of Zurich
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Tags

Readers

  • Computer Programming and Software Development.
  • Marine Mammal Biology
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • AI & ML