Evaluating (and Improving) the Correspondence Between Deep Neural Networks and Human Representations
Abstract
Decades of psychological research have been aimed at modeling how people learn features and categories. The empirical validation of these theories is often based on artificial stimuli with simple representations. Recently, deep neural networks have reached or surpassed human accuracy on tasks such as identifying objects in natural images. These networks learn representations of real‐world stimuli that can potentially be leveraged to capture psychological representations. We find that state‐of‐the‐art object classification networks provide surprisingly accurate predictions of human similarity judgments for natural images, but they fail to capture some of the structure represented by people. We show that a simple transformation that corrects these discrepancies can be obtained through convex optimization. We use the resulting representations to predict the difficulty of learning novel categories of natural images. Our results extend the scope of psychological experiments and computational modeling by enabling tractable use of large natural stimulus sets.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Pub Defense Publication
- Publication Date
- Sep 03, 2018
- Source ID
- 10.1111/cogs.12670
Entities
People
- Joshua C Peterson
- Joshua T. Abbott
- Thomas L. Griffiths
Organizations
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- National Science Foundation
- University of California, Berkeley