Picking Up and Defending the Faith: Activism and Radicalism Among Muslim Converts in the United States
Abstract
Muslim converts tend to be overrepresented in terrorist activity compared to fellow nonconvert Muslims. However, due to the low base rate of terrorism activity, there is a significant risk that this overrepresentation is a “false positive.” We therefore tested the prevalence of far more common, but potentially antecedent, cognitions to terrorism—activism and radicalism––among convert and nonconvert Muslims. We surveyed 356 American Muslim adults, of which 177 were self‐identified converts, with the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale or ARIS. We found that converts as compared to nonconverts do demonstrate higher activism and radicalism intention scores. We also found that activism fully mediates the relationship between conversion and radicalism. This suggests that converts may be more likely to engage in radical behavior (such as terrorism) than nonconverts, but only because they are more likely to engage in activism than nonconverts. We discuss these findings in light of current psychology and political mobilization literature, then we offer suggestions for future research on the relationships between conversion, activism, radicalism, and terrorism.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Pub Defense Publication
- Publication Date
- Jan 16, 2020
- Source ID
- 10.1111/pops.12645
Entities
People
- Ari D. Fodeman
- Daniel W. Snook
- John G. Horgan
Organizations
- Georgia State University
- Office of Naval Research