A Functional Model of Sensemaking in a Neurocognitive Architecture

Abstract

Sensemaking is the active process of constructing a meaningful representation (i.e., making sense) of some complex aspect of the world. In relation to intelligence analysis, sensemaking is the act of finding and interpreting relevant facts amongst the sea of incoming reports, images, and intelligence. We present a cognitive model of core information-foraging and hypothesis-updating sensemaking processes applied to complex spatial probability estimation and decision-making tasks. While the model was developed in a hybrid symbolic-statistical cognitive architecture, its correspondence to neural frameworks in terms of both structure and mechanisms provided a direct bridge between rational and neural levels of description. Compared against data from two participant groups, the model correctly predicted both the presence and degree of four biases: confirmation, anchoring and adjustment, representativeness, and probability matching. It also favorably predicted human performance in generating probability distributions across categories, assigning resources based on these distributions, and selecting relevant features given a prior probability distribution. This model provides a constrained theoretical framework describing cognitive biases as arising from three interacting factors: the structure of the task environment, the mechanisms and limitations of the cognitive architecture, and the use of strategies to adapt to the dual constraints of cognition and the environment.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Jan 01, 2013
Source ID
10.1155/2013/921695

Entities

People

  • Christian Lebiere
  • Jaehyon Paik
  • James Staszewski
  • John R. Anderson
  • Matthew Rutledge-taylor
  • Peter Pirolli
  • Robert Thomson

Organizations

  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
  • PARC

Tags

Readers

  • Geospatial Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence Analytics
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Theoretical Analysis.