Flexure and pressure-loading effects on the performance of structure–battery composite beams

Abstract

The effects of sustained three-point bend loading and hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical and energy-storage performance of three structure–battery beam prototypes were experimentally investigated. The SB beams, designed for unmanned underwater vehicle applications, were fabricated using marine-grade structural composite constituents and commercial rechargeable lithium-ion “pouch” cells. Low-temperature cure materials and multistep processing were used in fabrication to avoid exposing the cells to temperatures above 60℃. The results showed load relaxation (up to 6–18%) under constant displacement three-point bending within the elastic regime due to viscoelastic shear in adhesive bond layers between components and lamina. Concurrent cell charge–discharge during sustained load bending had a small effect on the load (∼1% change or less). Energy storage capacity under hydrostatic pressures up to 2 MPa, equivalent to 200 m ocean depth, showed a 6–8% decrease in capacity. The results highlighted the need for some design changes to improve structure–battery component performance including: exclusive use of high-temperature cure resins (epoxy or vinyl ester) to improve structural performance and enable single-step fabrication, and transverse (fiber) reinforcement to strengthen the interlayer bonds and embedded cell pockets to minimize load relaxation effects and maximize component bending strength.

Document Details

Document Type
Pub Defense Publication
Publication Date
Nov 12, 2018
Source ID
10.1177/0021998318810856

Entities

People

  • Giang T Pham
  • James P. Thomas
  • Siddiq M Qidwai
  • William R. Pogue Iii

Organizations

  • Division of Civil, Mechanical & Manufacturing Innovation
  • National Science Foundation
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory

Tags

Fields of Study

  • Materials science

Readers

  • Electrical Engineering
  • Structural Dynamics.
  • Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Structures.

Technology Areas

  • Autonomy