Demographics and (Equal?) Voice: Assessing Participation in Online Deliberative Sessions
Abstract
Critics of deliberative democracy have worried that deliberation may mirror (or even exacerbate) inequalities in participation across categories such as gender, race, and age. Accordingly, we investigate the potential for technology and design to ameliorate these concerns, looking at the extent to which online deliberative sessions facilitate inclusive participation. In a large study of online deliberation (over 1600 participants nested in hundreds of online sessions), we examine differences in the amount and nature of participation across demographic categories, as well as the effect of forum characteristics on such differences. Though our results are mixed, we read them with cautious optimism: the online format is not immune to inequalities in participation and satisfaction, but we do not observe differences across some demographics, and most observed differences are substantively minor. Moreover, features of online deliberation environments show promise for addressing some of the problems plaguing in-person designs.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Pub Defense Publication
- Publication Date
- Mar 10, 2020
- Source ID
- 10.1177/0032321719890805
Entities
People
- Amy Lee
- Anand E Sokhey
- Claire Abernathy
- David M.j. Lazer
- Kevin M Esterling
- Michael A Neblo
- Ryan Kennedy
- William Minozzi
Organizations
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
- John Templeton Foundation
- Northeastern University
- Ohio State University
- Stockton University
- University of California
- University of Colorado
- University of Houston