The Impact of Increasing Autonomy on Training Requirements in a UAV Supervisory Control Task
Abstract
A common assumption across many industries is that inserting advanced autonomy can often replace humans for low-level tasks, with cost reduction benefits. However, humans are often only partially replaced and moved into a supervisory capacity with reduced training. It is not clear how this shift from human to automation control and subsequent training reduction influences human performance, errors, and a tendency toward automation bias. To this end, a study was conducted to determine whether adding autonomy and skipping skill-based training could influence performance in a supervisory control task. In the human-in-the-loop experiment, operators performed unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) search tasks with varying degrees of autonomy and training. At the lowest level of autonomy, operators searched images and, at the highest level, an automated target recognition algorithm presented its best estimate of a possible target, occasionally incorrectly. Results were mixed, with search time not affected by skill-based training. However, novices with skill-based training and automated target search misclassified more targets, suggesting a propensity toward automation bias. More experienced operators had significantly fewer misclassifications when the autonomy erred. A descriptive machine learning model in the form of a hidden Markov model also provided new insights for improved training protocols and interventional technologies.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Pub Defense Publication
- Publication Date
- Aug 12, 2019
- Source ID
- 10.1177/1555343419868917
Entities
People
- Daniel Finkelstein
- Haibei Zhu
- Lixiao Huang
- Missy Cummings
- Ran Wei
Organizations
- Arizona State University
- Duke University
- Georgia Tech
- Office of Naval Research
- Texas A&M University
- United States Army Research Laboratory