Team Situation Awareness and Conflict: A Study of Human–Machine Teaming
Abstract
This article focuses on two fundamental human–human teamwork behaviors and seeks to understand them better in human–machine teams. Specifically, team situation awareness (TSA) and team conflict are examined in human–machine teams. There is a significant need to identify how TSA and team conflict occur during human–machine teaming, in addition to how they impact each other. In this work, we present an experiment aimed at understanding TSA and team conflict in the context of human–machine teaming in a remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS). Three conditions were tested: (1) control: teams consisted of all humans; (2) synthetic: teams consisted of the pilot role being occupied by a computational agent based on ACT-R architecture that employed AI capabilities, with all other team roles being humans; and (3) experimenter: an experimenter playing the role of the pilot as a highly effective computational agent, with the other roles being humans. The results indicate that TSA improved over time in synthetic teams, improved and then stabilized over time in experimenter teams, and did not improve in control teams. In addition, results show that control teams had the most team conflict. Finally, in the control condition, team conflict negatively impacts TSA.
Document Details
- Document Type
- Pub Defense Publication
- Publication Date
- May 19, 2021
- Source ID
- 10.1177/15553434211017354
Entities
People
- Manrong She
- Mustafa Demir
- Nancy J Cooke
- Nathan McNeese
Organizations
- Arizona State University
- Clemson University
- Office of Naval Research
- Tsinghua University