IMPROVING THE PREDICTIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER RATINGS

Abstract

low scores on peer ratings of leadership potential have been shown to predict failure to complete the Naval Air Training Program. It is hypothesized here, however, that low peer ratings awarded by reason of anti-social personality traits are invalid as predictors of training failure and that the predictiveness of low peer ratings would be improved by removing such cases from the sample. Of 278 low-rated cadets, 73 were identified as having been low- rated for anti-social reasons. There were significantly fewer failures to complete training among these men than among men who were low-rated for other reasons. On the basis of these findings it is recommended that any administrator utilizing a student's low peer rating score as an aid in deciding his probability of successfully completing the flight program consider the reasons given for the low rating.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 14, 1961
Accession Number
AD0263916

Entities

People

  • A. A. Longo
  • R. E. Doll

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Chi Square Test
  • Classification
  • Data Science
  • Education
  • Government Procurement
  • Governments
  • Information Science
  • Intelligence Tests
  • Leadership
  • Military Education
  • Military Training
  • Naval Aviation
  • Navy
  • Personality
  • Ratings
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.