SOME EFFECTS OF CLOSE AND PUNITIVE STYLES OF SUPERVISION

Abstract

An experiment based on a two-by-two factorial design was conducted to test hypotheses involving the relationship of four supervisory styles to aggressive feelings and actions of subordinates. As manipulated in the experiment, the supervisory styles can be arrayed on two continua: the close versus general, and the punitive versus nonpunitive. The results show that close as compared with general supervision produced a significant increase in aggressive feelings toward the supervisor, a significant increase in indirect aggression toward the supervisor through lowered productivity, an insignificant increase in verbal aggression toward the supervisor, and finally, an increase of borderline significance in aggressive feelings toward co-workers. The results also indicate that punitive as compared with non-punitive supervision produced a significant increase in aggressive feelings toward the supervisor, a significant increase in indirect aggression through lowered productivity, a significant increase in verbal aggression, but no significant increases in aggression toward coworkers or the task. Furthermore, the results indicate that the relationship between close supervision and aggressive feelings is mediated by self-esteem, a personality characteristic of the subordinate. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1961
Accession Number
AD0264837

Entities

People

  • Robert C. Day
  • Robert L. Hamblin

Organizations

  • Washington University in St. Louis

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Factorial Design
  • Hypotheses
  • Management Personnel
  • Personality
  • Personnel Management
  • Productivity
  • Supervision
  • Supervisors

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Organizational Psychology.