THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF PROMPTING AND CONFIRMATION FOR LEARNING A BOOLEAN ALGEBRA PROGRAM

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of prompting (P) and confirmation (C), and of three combinations (PP, PC, and CC) of these in the learning of a Boolean algebra program. It was hypothesized that: (1) the PC combination would be superior to the CC combination for acquisition of associations, and to the PP combination for retention of associations; (2) the PC and CC combinations would produce higher transfer scroes than the PP combination; and (3) the brightest students would be less affected by these combinations of experimental variables than the other students. None of the above hypotheses was confirmed by analysis of the main effects of the experimental treatments. Tests of the simple effects of these treatments revealed evidence contradictory to the first part of the first hypothesis. In the case of the third hypothesis, the acquisition scores of the upper intelligence group were differentially affected by the experimental treatments. Differences were statistically significant, although they were of smaller absolute magnitude than corresponding differences in the other two intelligence groups.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1962
Accession Number
AD0419305

Entities

People

  • Irving J. Budnoff
  • Joseph W. Rigney

Organizations

  • University of Southern California

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Acquisition
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Boolean Algebra
  • Digital Computers
  • Hypotheses
  • Intervals
  • Learning
  • Mathematics
  • Military Research
  • Procurement
  • Programmed Instruction
  • Psychology
  • Standards
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Students
  • Training
  • United States

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Naval Personnel Management
  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Theoretical Analysis.