SOME COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE DETERMINANTS OF DIFFERENTIATION, AND INTEGRATION,

Abstract

Eleven representatives of 4 principal conceptual systems ranging in abstractness from rather concrete to almost completely abstract, were tested on their differentiation and integration of 3 cognitive domains (people, institutions, and inanimate objects) toward which they were highly positive, highly negative and neutral. The representatives were selected by means of the TIB (This I Believe) Test. Differentiation and integration were assessed in the domains of people and intitutions to test an assumption that these areas are differentially relevant to representatives of the 4 conceptual systems and should be differentiated and integrared differently by them. The third domain of inanimate objects were selected because of their assumed low relevance to all 4 of the conceptual systems, making this domain an appropriate control against which to compare the effects of positive and negative involvement. The F for conceptual systems was not significant for eigher differentiation or integration. The nature of the attitude toward the objects significantly affected both differentiation and integration; neutrally regarded objects were differentiated and integrated significantly better than positively regarded objects. Variation in cognitive domains had no significant effect on either differentiation or integration. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jan 01, 1963
Accession Number
AD0427026

Entities

People

  • Jacob E. Hautaluoma
  • O. J. Harvey
  • Robert S. Wyer Jr.

Organizations

  • University of Colorado Boulder

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Concrete
  • Construction Materials

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Gender and Food Studies
  • Immunology and Pathology