A COMPARISON OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF VISUAL ACUITY TEST TARGETS.

Abstract

The validity of five targets for testing visual acuity was determined through the correlation of test results of each target with the Grow chart scores. In addition, the testretest reliability of all six tests was studied. The targets under consideration were: The Sight Screener, a New London letter target, two Randolph Field letter targets, and an adaptation of the Ortho-Rater checkerboard type target. One hundred subjects were employed. Acuity scores, obtained in Snellen equivalents, were translated into logunits to facilitate statistical analysis. Additional systems were essayed for scoring each of the Randolph Field tests. Statistical analyses consisted in (1) deriving test-retest reliability coefficients and coefficients of intercorrelation among the test scores by means of product-moment correlation, (2) determining the significance of the differences between test and retest mean scores, (3) determining the significance of the differences between mean scores on the various tests by the t tests, and (4) obtaining the conventional measures of dispersion and statistical reliability. Results of the statistical analyses and clinical observations of the examiners relating to each test are presented. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 03, 1964
Accession Number
AD0620310

Entities

People

  • Oscar Backstrom Jr.
  • Richard Trumbull

Organizations

  • Naval Aerospace Medical Institute

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Coefficients
  • Computing-Related Activities
  • Data Science
  • Dispersions
  • Field Tests
  • Information Science
  • Interdisciplinary Science
  • Mathematical Analysis
  • Mathematics
  • Observation
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reliability
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Statistics
  • Visual Acuity

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Psychometric Testing or Psychological Assessment.
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Vision Science/Vision Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience.