AN EXAMPLE OF MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FILTERING OF LASA SEISMOGRAMS.

Abstract

Realizable maximum-likelihood filtering was compared to time-shift-and-summation (phased summation) as an array processing procedure, using records from a single earthquake made by 398 seismometers at the Montana Large Aperture Seismic Array (LASA). The records were prefiltered to eliminate long-period microseismic noise. Within a single subarray (seven kilometers diameter), the maximum-likelihood filter improved signal-to-noise ratio approximately 5 db more than the phased sum. As a method for combining subarray outputs there was no significant difference between the maximumlikelihood filter and phased summation. Approximately two hours of CDC 1604-B machine time were required to calculate the maximum-likelihood filter for each 19-channel subarray. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 14, 1966
Accession Number
AD0629739

Entities

People

  • D. W. Mccowan
  • E. A. Flinn
  • R. A. Hartenberger

Organizations

  • Teledyne Technologies

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Arrays
  • Diameters
  • Earthquakes
  • Filters
  • Filtration
  • Seismic Arrays
  • Seismometers

Readers

  • Phased Array Antenna Design.
  • Seismology