AUDITORY VIGILANCE AS AFFECTED BY SIGNAL RATE AND INTERSIGNAL INTERVAL VARIABILITY

Abstract

Vigilance performances consisting of auditory threshold, latency and false-positive responses measures were obtained from 24 Navy and civilian subjects during the course of six daily 48-minute monitoring sessions in which Ss pressed a microswitch to report single tones in signal trains of increasing intensity. Six signal densities from 2.5 to 120 signals per hour, and six intersignal intervals ranging from 0 to 108 seconds around a signal rate of one per minute were found to have no differential effect on auditory threshold. An improvement of 3.25 dB in signal/noise detection occurred when signal density was increased from 2.5 to 15 per hour. Higher rates were not additionally effective. Below the rate of 15/hour, response latency increased regularly with the slower rates, though there was no further improvement with higher signal densities. Thus a rate of about one signal every four minutes was the most efficient density. Time-on-watch analysis revealed large individual differences. An analysis of false-positive responding indicated that false alarms were unrelated to signal rate, intersignal variability, or listening session.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 02, 1965
Accession Number
AD0638607

Entities

People

  • Richard L. Martz

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Analysis Of Variance
  • Combinatorial Analysis
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Data Science
  • Detection
  • Experimental Design
  • False Alarms
  • Information Science
  • Intensity
  • Intervals
  • Monitoring
  • Navy
  • Signal Detection
  • Standards
  • Warning Systems

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Brain and Cognitive Science; Experimental Psychology; Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radar Systems Engineering.