LEADERSHIP IN NEGOTIATIONS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE.

Abstract

Dyad negotiation teams (homogenous in the complexity of the individuals' conceptual structure) spent several hours attempting to solve a simulated international conflict situation. Every participant repeatedly rated himself and the other participants on Stogdill's ten leadership characteristics. The dyad member with the overall highest ratings on all scales was considered the dyad's leader. The effect of simplicity and complexity of conceptual structure on the degree to which leaders display Stogdill's leadership characteristics was analyzed in an ANOV design. The interaction effect for complexity and leadership characteristics was highly significant. Complex leaders were rated higher on 'Tolerance for Uncertainty', 'Assumption of Leadership Role', 'Consideration', and 'Predictive Accuracy'. Simple leaders were rated higher on 'Initiation of Structure', 'Production Emphasis' and 'Demands Reconciliation'. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1967
Accession Number
AD0656368

Entities

People

  • Carl H. Castore
  • Siegfried Streufert
  • Susan C. Kliger

Organizations

  • Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • International Conflicts
  • Leadership
  • Negotiations
  • Production
  • Uncertainty

Readers

  • Brain and Cognitive Science; Experimental Psychology; Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Theoretical Analysis.