COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING COMMUNICATIONS PROCEDURES,

Abstract

Comparisons were made between programmed and conventional instruction within the schools of the Naval Air Technical Training Command. In this study a comparison was made between two versions of the Airborne Radio Code Operator (ARCO) Course. In the Conventional version, Military Communication Procedures was taught by means of lecture-discussion sessions; in the Program version, this same material was taught by means of programmed booklets. The students in the Program version required a total of 14.5 hours to cover this material, as opposed to a total of 30 hours required for the lecture-discussion sessions of the Conventional version. This afforded a savings of better than 50% over this particular portion of the course, and a savings of two days in the total length of the course. Mastery of the material was measured by means of two special tests. On the multiple choice test, the Conventional group was found to be slightly better than the Program group; on the short answer test, the Program group was found to be slightly better than the Conventional group. The difference favoring the Program group was somewhat larger than the difference favoring the Conventional group. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1967
Accession Number
AD0656894

Entities

People

  • Kirk A. Johnson
  • Robert O. Baldwin

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Airborne
  • Education
  • Instructions
  • Materials
  • Military Communications
  • Programmed Instruction
  • Schools
  • Students
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Mathematics or Statistics
  • STEM Education

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3