Study and Development of Equipment for Simulating Blind Flying. Phase B: Field Survey

Abstract

In order to determine the important areas of agreement and disagreement concerning simulated blind flying equipment, a questionnaire was administered to 143 Navy pilots at two air stations. Information about usage of the equipment, evaluations of various systems, and difficulties with and desired improvements in the Blue-Amber system were obtained on the basis of actual flying experience. The most-used systems were found to be Regular Blue-Amber, SNJ Hood, and Multi-Engine Hood. Four systems are probably at least acceptable to almost all pilots: (1) Cardboard Beak - safe in most respects and easy to use, though probably not applicable in all situations. (2) SNJ Hood - simple and adaptable, though not applicable to multi-engine planes. (3) Venetian Blind - comfortable for fliers and amenable to development, though of doubtful safety and applicable only to multi-engine aircraft. (4) Regular Blue-Amber - especially helpful in developing instrument flying proficiency, though difficult to use properly and of doubtful safety.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 1949
Accession Number
AD0660005

Entities

People

  • John C. Flanagan
  • Robert Fitzpatrick

Organizations

  • American Institutes for Research

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Aircrafts
  • Altitude
  • Asthenopia
  • Birds
  • Cloud Cover
  • Earphones
  • Engineering
  • Instructors
  • Instrument Flight
  • Instrument Panels
  • Materials
  • Medical Personnel
  • Military Operations
  • Phase
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Students
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Engineering

Readers

  • Aviation Science / Aeronautics.
  • Materials Science
  • Systems Analysis and Design