COMPARING AND TUNING PI AND PID DIGITAL CONTROL ALGORITHMS.

Abstract

For years engineers have followed the practice of installing proportional-plus-integral (PI) controllers in the 'normal' control loops and proportional-plus-integral-plus-derivative (PID) controllers in the 'tough' control loops--usually slow loops involving temperature. The typical reason given is that the additional cost of the derivative mode could only be justified in difficult control loops. Another reason is that the PID controller is much more difficult to tune, and engineers would prefer not to undertake it unless necessary. With the advent of direct digital control systems, the increased cost of using a PID algorithm instead of a PI algorithm is negligible, and only the tuning problem remains. Perhaps automated tuning procedures will be perfected in the future to eliminate this problem, but for the present, some guidelines are needed for determining when and how PID and PI algorithms should be used. This report attempts to answer some of these questions about PI and PID algorithms. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 1969
Accession Number
AD0688795

Entities

People

  • Cecil L. Smith
  • Paul W. Murrill
  • Uday D. Shendrikar

Organizations

  • Louisiana State University

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Algorithms
  • Control Systems
  • Engineers
  • Integrals

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Robotics and Automation.
  • Systems Analysis and Design