COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ABILITY AND PRESENTATION MODE IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION.

Abstract

The performance of 64 high and low ability students was compared on an instructional sequence in 'significant figures,' a mathematical concept, which was presented via programmed instruction and computer-assisted instruction. The programmed test consisted of 52 linear frames. The CAI program which was presented on a cathode-ray tube terminal (CRT) had the same basic frames plus remediation for incorrect responses as well as remedial loops. The results on a posttest, retention test, and learning errors, indicated that high ability students performed better than low ability students; students using PI performed significantly better than those using CAI, and in each case there was a significant ability by treatment interaction. The observed differences are attributed to the very poor performance of the low ability students who used the CRT terminal. It is suggested that low ability students may require hard copy memory aids to supplement CAI learning experiences. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1969
Accession Number
AD0694021

Entities

People

  • Raymond Latta
  • Walter Dick

Organizations

  • Florida State University

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Cathode Ray Tubes
  • Computers
  • Hard Copy
  • Instructions
  • Learning
  • Programmed Instruction
  • Sequences
  • Students
  • Terminals

Fields of Study

  • Education

Readers

  • Electronics Engineering
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • STEM Education