MILITARY MOVEMENTS AND SUPPLY LINES AS COMPARATIVE INTERDICTION TARGETS

Abstract

An initial attempt to provide a quantitative basis for comparing military unit movements with unit-supply lines as targets for interdiction. Based on U.S. Army unit tables of equipment and standard supply planning factors, the analysis shows that a division movement is considerably more vulnerable to attacks directed against road capacity than that division's supply line would be. Even with all assumptions biased in favor of mobility (no traffic congestion, no vehicle breakdowns, no command control problems, POL available as needed), road movement of an infantry division consumes 6 to 8 times as much of a road's surge capacity as its daily combat resupply consumes of the road's average steady-state capacity. For rail movement, the redeployment/resupply ratio is very large, varying from 127 to 145 times the railroad capacity needed for resupply.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jul 01, 1970
Accession Number
AD0711639

Entities

People

  • J. W. Higgins

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Interdiction
  • Ammunition
  • Army
  • Deployment
  • Engineering
  • Engineers
  • Land Transportation
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Vehicles
  • Railroad Cars
  • Second World War
  • Steady State
  • Transportation
  • Vehicles
  • War
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Economics
  • Maritime Combat Support and Expeditionary Logistics.