An Evaluation of Three Possible Explanations of the Temporal Decay in Predicting Pilot Proficiency,

Abstract

The fact that Air Force pilot selection tests do not adequately predict pilot success in operational tactical units is consistent with the generally reported finding that correlations between ability measures and performance decrease over time. This effort investigated the validity of three explanations for this predictive decay: tasks are restructured during training, basic abilities are altered as a function of training, and both of these changes occur. Two groups of students were administered an extensive battery of ability tests at the beginning and again at the end of a 16-week period. The experimental subjects received basic flight training during this interval, whereas the control subjects did not. Support for the third hypothesis resulted from appropriate comparisons between the groups' pretest and posttest scores on ability measures, as well as analysis of the experimental group's flight training performance. The implication of this finding for both selection and training research is discussed. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1971
Accession Number
AD0731191

Entities

People

  • Charles L. Hulin
  • Kenneth M. Alvares

Organizations

  • University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Education
  • Flight Training
  • Intervals
  • Military Pilots
  • Pilots
  • Students
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training

Fields of Study

  • Psychology

Readers

  • Aviation Science / Aeronautics.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Theoretical Analysis.