The Appropriateness of the Thai Naval Academy Curriculum.

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty Thai Naval officers were surveyed to determine the appropriateness of the Thai Naval Academy curriculum. Seventy-seven responded. They were asked to rank the importance of subjects in the curriculum for two criteria: the naval profession, and intellectual development of the individual. The rankings were scaled using the 'Ford computer program.' A judge reliability check done by correlating the rankings of half the judges against the other half showed a high positive correlation (r = .908), indicating uniformity of judgements. The scaled 'weights' of both criteria were then reduced to one dimension by orthogonal projection onto a straight line contained in the plane with the two criteria as their axes. The resulting 'weights' were used as the criterion variable and compared with percent of instruction time per subject in the curriculum. The correlation coefficient (rho) between the ranks of the weights and the ranks of the instruction time was low (rho = .423), but significant. The difference in the ranks were used as indicator of each subject's level of appropriateness. Many subjects were found to be inappropriate. Adjustments of instruction time or replacement of those subjects highly inappropriate was deemed advisable. (Author)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1973
Accession Number
AD0769394

Entities

People

  • Prasart Sribhadung

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Coefficients
  • Computer Program Reliability
  • Computer Programs
  • Computers
  • Curriculum
  • Indicators
  • Instructions
  • Judgment
  • Reliability
  • United States Naval Academy

Readers

  • Regression Analysis.
  • STEM Education