The Similarity of Job Types Reported from Two Independent Analyses of Occupational Data.

Abstract

Occupational analysts using Comprehensive Occupational Data Analysis Programs (CODAP) make subjective decisions at various stages in their analysis of an occupation. The possibility exists that two different analysts could reach different conclusions in analyzing an occupation, and thereby provide divergent guidance to management. Two analysts, working independently, performed job typing using CODAP on occupational data collected by a single administration of a job inventory. Each analyst selected the same size sample at random but without any cases common, from the total survey. The job types identified by each analyst were compared to determine whether they were significantly different in any respect. Superficial differences appeared between the results of the two analyses, but were largely resolved when job types reported by the first analyst were compared not only on a one-to-one basis with job types reported by the second analyst, but also with combinations of job types reported on the second occasion. (Modified author abstract)

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 01, 1974
Accession Number
AD0776777

Entities

People

  • William J. Watson

Organizations

  • Brooks Air Force Base

Tags

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Abstracts
  • Collaborative Techniques
  • Data Analysis
  • Delphi Method
  • Guidance
  • Inventory

Readers

  • Occupational Health and Safety.
  • Theoretical Analysis.