AN ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OF THE USAF CONTRACTUAL OVERHAUL AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Abstract

The United States Air Force conducts approximately 50 percent of its depot level aircraft overhaul and maintenance through the use of commercial contractors. An analysis is made of the underlying causes of program difficulties. The thesis concludes that the major area of mutual concern to both governmental contract administration services and contractor personnel is the lack of effective and timely government furnished property support. Further conclusions established as a result of the research are: (1) a continued effort to more precisely delineate work specifications is necessary; (2) the Air Force Procurement Instructions should be amended to provide a more feasible method of approving work requests; (3) a need for a new military specification attuned to overhaul and maintenance type work is indicated; (4) the interface between the Officer-In-Charge (OIC) of a USAF contract administration detachment and the technically cognizant AMA needs to be more clearly defined; (5) more authority and a clearer definition of responsibility be given to the OIC; (6) anticipated increses in the magnitude of the program indicate a requirement for further study of workload and manning levels.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Aug 01, 1966
Accession Number
AD0805060

Entities

People

  • James J. Garibaldi
  • Robert P. Perry

Organizations

  • Air Force Institute of Technology

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Air Force Personnel
  • Aircrafts
  • Civilian Personnel
  • Computer Programs
  • Contract Administration
  • Contractors
  • Contracts
  • Data Analysis
  • Governments
  • Maintenance
  • Organizational Structure
  • Standards
  • United States
  • Web Browsers

Readers

  • Government and Public Administration Law.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.
  • Logistics and Supply Chain Management.