Will the Attack Fighter Fulfill the Army's Close Air Support Requirements

Abstract

The basic question addressed in this research report is the capability of the Attack Fighter (A-X) to fulfill the Army's close air support requirements. The A-X's capability was analyzed in relation to the tactical air power doctrine, and, particularly, the relationship of the close air support mission to the counter-air and interdiction missions. Further, the A-X was evaluated against the requirements for responsiveness, ordnance carriage capability, lethality, maneuverability, survivability, communication equipment and simplicity of design. Since the AH-56 Cheyenne and the AV-8 Harrier are competing for this mission, the A-X was compared with these vehicles. The conclusions reached were that: the Marines should continue their procurement, development of operational techniques and experience with the Harrier; the Army should cancel the Cheyenne and the Air Force should continue with the A-x Program.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 23, 1972
Accession Number
AD0912755

Entities

People

  • James E. Daniel Jr.

Organizations

  • United States Army War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Power
  • Aircraft Equipment
  • Aircrafts
  • Airframes
  • Amphibious Military Vehicles
  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Helicopters
  • Maintenance
  • Military Aircraft
  • Munitions
  • Procurement
  • Short Takeoff Aircraft
  • Tactical Air Support
  • Test And Evaluation
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Military Science
  • Systems Analysis and Design