Development of a Physical Employment Testing Battery for 12B Combat Engineers

Abstract

The U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM) was tasked by the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) to develop criterion-based physical requirements for entry into the seven physically demanding combat MOSs, including the 12B Combat Engineers. Researchers from USARIEM completed three studies to develop a valid, safe, and legally defensible physical performance battery to predict a Solder's ability to serve in the MOS. Study 1 involved measuring and identifying the physiological requirements of each of the tasks of the MOS in order to identify a set of criterion tasks encompassing the physical demands of all of the tasks of the MOS. Study 2 involved developing task simulations of the four most physically demanding tasks (casualty evacuation, casualty drag, sandbag carry, and foot march). In the final study, four test batteries were developed to fit a range of needs of the Army. Potential predictor tests included 300 m sprint, 2-min arm ergometer, beep test, medicine ball put, 1-min sit-up, 1-min push-up, standing long jump, and 38 cm upright pull.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Dec 10, 2015
Accession Number
AD1000451

Entities

People

  • Bradley J. Warr
  • Deborah L. Gebhardt
  • Edward J. Zambraski
  • Gabriele Furbay
  • Jan E. Redmond
  • Marilyn A. Sharp
  • Peter N. Frykman
  • Stephen A Foulis
  • Todd A. Baker

Organizations

  • United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Artillery
  • Body Armor
  • Data Science
  • Doctrine
  • Employment
  • Indirect Fire
  • Information Science
  • Measurement
  • Military Science
  • Military Training
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Predictive Modeling
  • Protective Equipment
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Surveys
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Exercise and Sports Science.
  • Instructional Design and Training Evaluation.