Friendly Combat Casualties and Operational Narratives

Abstract

A complex relationship exists between friendly combat casualties and public support, in the context of 21st century limited wars. A myth persists that Western civilian populations are casualty phobic, and as such military leaders are often risk-averse. In reality, the public responds in a much more nuanced way, and in general terms makes a rational cost-benefit analysis of the use of military force to achieve policy options. Military planners must understand the relationship between casualties and public support, and comprehend the critical importance of narrative in supporting or undermining national will. A gap exists in doctrine regarding friendly combat casualties, between risk management at the tactical level and narrative creation and communication at the strategic level. To bridge the gap, the author proposes the term "operational narrative," as a means of conceptualizing the way that tactical actions must link to strategy to support a war narrative. Using operational narrative and a modified form of risk management doctrine, operational leaders can make better decisions about the risks that friendly combat casualties pose to strategic success.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 21, 2015
Accession Number
AD1001645

Entities

People

  • Errol G. Maceachern

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Afghanistan Conflict
  • Air Force
  • Civil War
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Doctrine
  • Governments
  • Information Operations
  • Joint Military Activities
  • Military Operations
  • Risk
  • Risk Analysis
  • Risk Management
  • Sectarian Violence
  • Terrorism
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Trauma or Military Medicine