Costs of Alternative Approaches to SDI

Abstract

In the Missile Defense Act of 1991, the Congress declared a new policy goal: the nation should strive to deploy defenses to protect itself against attacks by a limited number of ballistic missiles. The act represented the first time since the inception of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) in 1983 that the Congress has explicitly supported the Administration's aim of deploying a system of missile defenses in the United States. Defenses against ballistic missiles would consist of three components: sensors, based on the ground or in space, to detect incoming missiles; interceptors, also based on the ground or in space, to intercept and destroy the missiles or their warheads; and a command system to coordinate all activities. The Missile Defense Act directed the Administration to begin deploying by 1996or as soon as technically feasible-a limited defense that would comply with the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. The act envisions the subsequent deployment of more capable defenses, if needed, that could include additional sites as well as space-based sensors; those defenses would require that the United States renegotiate or withdraw from the ABM treaty.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 01, 1992
Accession Number
AD1001736

Entities

People

  • David Mosher
  • Raymond Hall

Organizations

  • Congressional Budget Office

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Sensors
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Anti-Ballistic Missiles
  • Ballistic Missiles
  • Command And Control
  • Command And Control Systems
  • Cost Estimates
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Directed Energy Weapons
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Ground Based
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles
  • Procurement
  • Space Based
  • Systems Engineering
  • Test And Evaluation
  • United States

Readers

  • Missile Defense Systems.
  • Strategic Security Studies

Technology Areas

  • Space