Persistence of toxic and unethical leadership: how does the US Army improve leader development and selection

Abstract

Statistics show that toxic and unethical leadership is a problem in the US Army and leadership research concludes that this problem has a negative effect on the conduct of mission command. This monograph asks what the US Army can do to better reduce toxic and unethical leadership and develop officers to optimize the force for mission command. To do so the monograph examines the leader development and evaluation systems and, based on findings from those examinations, makes two recommendations to improve the US Army's performance in selecting leaders. The first recommendation is to add additional accountability to the conduct of individual assessments within the Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback program, bringing the individual assessment in line with the Commander 360 assessment. The second recommendation is to use multi-rater feedback concerning the ability to conduct mission command from the Commander 360 as a component of selection for command. The monograph closes with a discussion of potential obstacles to implementation of the recommendations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 21, 2015
Accession Number
AD1001916

Entities

People

  • Marcus White

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accountability
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Feedback
  • General Officers
  • Governments
  • Human Resources
  • Leadership
  • Management Personnel
  • Military Education
  • Military Operations
  • Performance Appraisals
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Test And Evaluation
  • Training

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.