Facilitating the Transition from Bright to Dim Environments

Abstract

High on the list of desired capabilities for Warfighters, enumerated by MG Walter Wojdakowski at the 2008 Fort Benning Lab Day, was the development of combat protective eyewear with lenses that would instantly change the amount of light transmitted based on incident lighting conditions. This study compared five different eyewear conditions: (1) no eyewear, (2) Approved Protective Eyewear List (APEL) clear eyewear, (3) APEL sun eyewear, (4) step-filter eyewear, and (5) electro-optical eyewear. Dark adaptation responsiveness and target recognition were most effective with the step-filter eyewear compared to the control, clear, and sunglass conditions. The step-filter and electro-optical eyewear were both subjectively preferred over all other approaches. Operational performance results while wearing either of these two optical devices were equally effective and consequently the ultimate fielding decision could be based on acquisition-related differences (cost and/or time).

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 04, 2016
Accession Number
AD1007463

Entities

People

  • Daniel Riggs
  • David L. Still
  • David V. Walsh
  • Heath Cox
  • Jonathan K. Statz
  • Leonard A. Temme
  • Morris R. Lattimore
  • Roddricus Allen
  • Will Weiser

Organizations

  • United States Army Aeromedical Research Lab

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Accuracy
  • Control Knobs
  • Control Panels
  • Department Of Defense
  • Detection
  • Identification
  • Institutional Review Board
  • Light Sources
  • Military Personnel
  • Object Recognition
  • Recognition
  • Sensitivity
  • Social Sciences
  • Standards
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Target Recognition
  • Visual Acuity

Readers

  • Circadian Sleep-Wake Regulation and Chronobiology
  • Defense Acquisition Program Management