Let's Get Counterinsurgency Right: Collective Action Theory in Joint Publication 3-24

Abstract

Major military counterinsurgency doctrines of the last century, which are almost exclusively based on practice, avoid references to theories that address the tension between opposing sides for popular participation in insurgency. Failures in current doctrine, to cognate and adhere to one uniform concept of the issue at hand and to present all lessons learned with sufficient evidence establishing them as valid precepts, are caused by a similar failure. JP 3-24 does not incorporate a theory of rational choice to counter what it presents as the root cause of insurgency: "people support an insurgency because they perceive it is in their best interest." This paper presents a literature review of relevant current and historical doctrine, conflict theories, and recent research into these theories. Further, this paper suggests a useful addition to current doctrine to improve efforts to capture lessons learned from recent conflicts and prepare commanders for counterinsurgency in future conflicts.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Apr 01, 2015
Accession Number
AD1012806

Entities

People

  • Andrew P. Bowers

Organizations

  • Air Command and Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Civil War
  • Counterinsurgency
  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • Governments
  • Insurgency
  • Lessons Learned
  • National Governments
  • New York
  • Relativity Theory
  • Terrorism
  • Terrorists
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Political Violence and Terrorism Studies.