Establishing Sentencing Guidelines for Military Courts-Martial

Abstract

The debate over the adequacy of the militarys sentencing procedures is not new. It has been a contentious issue since the first Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) was published in 1951. Recent negative attention on the militarys handling of sexual assault cases has brought the military justice system once again under scrutiny and rekindled arguments for mandatory minimum sentences, judge-only sentencing, adoption of the federal sentencing standards, and establishment of military sentencing standards. These arguments present provocative cases, but I believe the establishment of UCMJ-centric military sentencing guidelines, to be applied by judges only, is the best option to address sentence disparity because it relieves the administrative burden of keeping military panels for the sentencing phase and aligns the military criminal justice system more closely to the federal procedures, while retaining a distinct military process that fits the unique nature of military service.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Nov 01, 2014
Accession Number
AD1012807

Entities

People

  • Carrie E. Wentzel

Organizations

  • Air Command and Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Congress
  • Court Martial
  • Crime
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Criminals
  • Department Of Defense
  • Human Behavior
  • Instructions
  • Law
  • Marine Corps
  • Sentence (Law)
  • Sexual Assault
  • Supreme Court
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • Strategic Security Studies