Accountability: The Most Underappreciated Aspect of Command

Abstract

Air Force commanders at every level are accountable for the actions, successes, and failures of their command and those under their command; it is the most underappreciated aspect of command. This paper examines two senior officer accountability events: the 2007 Minot-Barksdale AFB nuclear incident in which six nuclear weapons were transported with neither authorization nor knowledge of the Airmen involved and the 1994 B-52 crash at Fairchild AFB. In each, senior commanders were held accountable for the actions and inaction of others. In the former, three commanders are scrutinized for their role and willingness to be held to account. In the latter, base-level commanders were relieved and the Air Force Chief of Staff and Secretary of the Air Force were forced to resign. Yet intermediate commanders seem to have been untouched calling into question skip-echelon command structures and general officer accountability.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 15, 2012
Accession Number
AD1018601

Entities

People

  • Robert G. Battema

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Counter WMD
  • Human Systems
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Air Force Facilities
  • Bombs
  • Court Martial
  • Department Of Defense
  • General Officers
  • Instructors
  • Military Education
  • Military Science
  • New York
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Personnel Management
  • Students
  • Task Forces
  • United States
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.