Cost Considerations of Transition toward a Disaggregated Satellite Architecture

Abstract

The US is disaggregating space architectures by splitting missions currently combined on large satellites into mission-specific smaller satellites. Disaggregation offers five potential key advantages: resiliency, technology refresh, industrial base, adaptability, and cost. Experts essentially concur on the first four advantages, but disagree about cost.The reason for disagreement on whether disaggregation will save money is that space system cost modeling depends heavily on the assumptions underlying the models. Based on the assumptions currently used today, disaggregation is likely to cost more than continuing the status quo; modeling the costs to disaggregate a hypothetical communications satellite into four smaller satellites illustrates this finding.The key to lowering the cost of disaggregation is to examine the major underlying assumptions that are driving cost conclusions. Cost advantages will emerge from disaggregated architectures when the US significantly reduces launch costs, significantly increases resiliency requirements, and/or values architecture flexibility more highly.All three of these factors advantageous to disaggregated architectures are trending favorably and the US could accelerate them to enable cost-effective disaggregation. The US should switch to competitively procured US commercial launch capabilities, backed up by foreign capabilities when needed. In addition, the US national security space enterprise should incorporate resiliency requirements into space architectures and value architecture flexibility more highly. Finally, the US must recognize that the transition to disaggregated architectures will be challenging, politically more than technically. US space leaders should pay attention to disaggregation implementation details such as budget phasing, formal requirements and policies, and countering inertia and other barriers to change.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 14, 2013
Accession Number
AD1018821

Entities

People

  • Eric J. Felt

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Artificial Satellites
  • Congress
  • Cost Analysis
  • Cost Estimates
  • Department Of Defense
  • Governments
  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
  • National Security
  • Reconnaissance Satellites
  • Satellite Buses
  • Small Satellites
  • Space Systems
  • Space Transportation
  • Spacecraft
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • War Colleges

Readers

  • Aerospace Engineering.
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Systems Analysis and Design

Technology Areas

  • Space
  • Space - Satellites