The Coercive Efficacy of Air Exclusion Zones: Myth or Reality

Abstract

Following U.S. excursions in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is renewed interest in the no-fly, or air exclusion, zone as a coercive instrument. Yet, there is no conclusive agreement over the coercive efficacy of air exclusion zones. Thus, the goal of this study is determine if air exclusion zones are an effective and efficient coercive alternative to major combat operations and, if so, under what conditions. To answer this question, the study compares and contrasts three recent cases, Iraq, Bosnia and Libya, where air exclusion zones were the primary means of coercion. Following this examination, the study concludes that, given certain circumstances, air exclusion zones are an effective and efficient coercive alternative to major combat operations.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2012
Accession Number
AD1019691

Entities

People

  • Robert A. Long

Organizations

  • Air University

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Civil War
  • Combat Operations
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Department Of Defense
  • Economic Sanctions
  • Intergovernmental Organizations
  • International Law
  • International Organizations
  • International Relations
  • Iraqi-War
  • Joint Military Activities
  • Military Science
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Military History / Militaries and War Studies
  • Military and Counterinsurgency Studies.