Building a Foundation on Sand: The Demise of Leaders Resulting from Toxic Followership

Abstract

The US Army tends to over-emphasize leader development, neglecting the integral role followers play in organizational decision-making. This reflects the assumption that good leaders are also good followers, but this assumption does not hold up under scrutiny. Often, friction between leaders and followers results in followers who develop toxic followership traits, which cause them to undermine the leader and the organization. Effective leaders act as toxic followers when they subvert authority in this manner. The US Army seeks to develop leaders through education, experience, and training. This teaches individuals to amplify their strengths as leaders and to use these traits to achieve results, but this can contribute to neglect of the individual's skill as a follower. When this leads to toxic followership, that individual ultimately loses effectiveness as a leader as well. History reveals this trend even at the highest levels, in which the President relieves a general officer. While many critics cite failures in leadership as the cause, the relief often results from toxic followership. This provides a warning for US Army leader development. When individuals build their leadership foundation on the sand, they will likely fail in the future.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 26, 2016
Accession Number
AD1021975

Entities

People

  • Adam K. Greene

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Civil War
  • Congress
  • Contingency Operations (Military)
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Military Science
  • National Governments
  • National Politics
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Psychology
  • Second World War
  • Social Psychology
  • United States Government

Readers

  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.
  • Strategic Security Studies