Improving Operational Wargaming: Its All Fun and Games Until Someone Loses a War

Abstract

In 2015, Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work committed the Department of Defense (DOD) to overhaul its approach to wargaming in order to reinvigorate innovation across the DOD, including a five-year target to use wargames to improve operational planning. This monograph explores the causes of wargaming failures and proposes recommendations for successful wargames. Does doctrine provide sufficient guidance, striking the appropriate balance between prescriptive and descriptive guidance? This monograph postulates that wargaming theory including game element analysis and wargame pathologies provides an excellent rubric for creating and evaluating wargames and wargaming doctrine, that doctrine and practice diverge from wargame theory, and that current doctrine does not provide sufficient guidance. The theory history doctrine approach of this monograph is intended for military planners, doctrine authors, and wargaming professionals. Wargames are a useful tool to assess plans as directed in operational planning processes; however, commanders and staffs should neither equate wargame victory with wargame success, nor consider either as "validation" of a given plan. There are ten elements of wargame design: objectives, scenario, database, models, rules and procedures, infrastructure, participants, analysis, culture and environment, and audiences. These elements provide a framework for creating wargames, and analyzing wargames and their failure modes (known as pathologies). By evaluating Japan's Midway campaign plan through the theories of game element analysis and wargame pathologies, this monograph creates greater understanding of those theories and provides recommendations for doctrine. Pathologies exhibited by Japanese planners include those related to wargame objectives, scenario, database, model, participants, and culture; genuine testing of the Operation MI plan appears to have been impossible.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 26, 2016
Accession Number
AD1021990

Entities

People

  • Matthew E. Hanson

Organizations

  • United States Army Command and General Staff College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • C4I
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Force
  • Amphibious Operations
  • Department Of Defense
  • Doctrine
  • Education
  • Governments
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • Naval Operations
  • Navy
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Training
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • War Colleges
  • War Games
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Defense Acquisition Program Management
  • Game Theory.
  • Systems Analysis and Design