Comparison of Two Railgun Power Supply Architectures to Quantify the Energy Dissipated After the Projectile Leaves the Railgun

Abstract

Railgun muzzle flash, or post-fire arcing, is a major concern to the Navy because of the potential associated thermal stresses. In this thesis, we compared two railgun power supplies in Matlab Simulink to quantify their associated post-fire energy. When the armature exits the rails, a finite energy from the railgun pulsed-power supply is inductively stored in the rails and discharges at the muzzle. This energy, which is due to the loss of the low-voltage electrical contact that is ordinarily between the armature and the rail, is forced by the system inductance to flow as an electrical discharge, creating a muzzle flash. Quantification of this post-fire rail energy in our simulation from both the existing railgun power supply and the proposed power supplya thyristor-based power supply versus a buck-boost converter, respectivelyreveals that the buck-boost converter topology is better suited for the railgun, particularly at minimizing the post-fire muzzle energy. The minimization of the post-fire energy allows for an extended rail life and potentially longer usage.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Jun 01, 2016
Accession Number
AD1026829

Entities

People

  • Mitchell C. Stewart

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Armatures
  • Chemical Industry
  • Converters
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Energy
  • Equivalent Circuits
  • Flashes
  • Inductance
  • Magnetic Fields
  • Muzzle Flash
  • Power
  • Power Supplies
  • Pulsed Power
  • Simulations
  • Switched Mode Power Supplies
  • Topology
  • Voltage

Readers

  • Electrical Engineering
  • ballistics.