Restoring the Power Projection Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces

Abstract

Good morning, Chairman McCain, Ranking Member Reed, members of the committee, and staff. I appreciate the opportunity to share insights that my colleagues and I have gained from more than a decade of analyzing emerging threats to U.S. military operations. Our work has revealed some serious and growing gaps in the capabilities of U.S. forces, raising questions about their ability to accomplish the strategically important mission of deterring and defeating aggression by adversary states. I therefore applaud the committee's efforts to focus attention on how the Department of Defense (DoD) can best act to reverse the deterioration in the military balance of power in key regions. The security environment in which U.S. forces operate and for which they must prepare is, in important ways, more complex and more demanding than the one that DoD has used to build and evaluate todays force. To be clear: Our force planning prior to Russias attacks on Ukraine did not take account of the need to deter large-scale aggression against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); We also have not moved quickly enough to provide the capabilities and basing posture needed to meet the manifold challenges posed by Chinas rapidly modernizing armed forces; The prospect of deliverable nuclear weapons in the hands of North Korea and, potentially, Iran poses challenges for which we do not have satisfactory answers.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 16, 2017
Accession Number
AD1027356

Entities

People

  • David Ochmanek

Organizations

  • RAND Corporation

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Engineered Resilient Systems
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Space
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Aircrafts
  • Artillery Ammunition
  • Cruise Missiles
  • Defense Systems
  • Department Of Defense
  • Intellectual Property
  • Military Operations
  • Munitions
  • Nato
  • North Korea
  • Payload
  • Public Policy
  • Rockets
  • Short Range Air Defense
  • United States
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Readers

  • Educational Psychology
  • Public Financial Management and Budgeting
  • Strategic Security Studies