Tried And True Integrating Active And Reserve Components

Abstract

Total Force Integration has proven to be an effective and efficient way to capitalize on the strengths of the Active and Reserve Components. Senior leadership has advocated for integrating the active and reserve forces to maximize capabilities and execute the mission in a more efficient, cost effective manner. This paper examines the differences in duty status between the Active and Reserve Components, administrative control and operational direction, and three different constructs for integrating active duty, Air National Guard, and Reserve personnel into a wing structure. Classic Associations have the Active Component as the lead organization; Active Associations put a Reserve Component (either Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve) as the lead, and the Integrated Wing combines the leadership into one chain of command. While the Classic and Active Associations have a history of effectively integrating forces, the Integrated Wing requires further testing and refinement to overcome command and control, legal, and personnel management issues.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 16, 2016
Accession Number
AD1037639

Entities

People

  • Joe Delgado

Organizations

  • Air War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Materials and Manufacturing Processes
  • Weapons Technologies

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Active Duty
  • Air Force
  • Air National Guard
  • Aircrafts
  • Employment
  • Governments
  • Law
  • Lessons Learned
  • Maintenance
  • National Guard
  • Organizational Structure
  • Personnel Management
  • Tanker Aircraft
  • United States
  • United States Government
  • War Colleges
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Joint Military Operations and Doctrine.
  • Robotics and Automation.

Technology Areas

  • Fully Networked C3
  • Fully Networked C3 - Command and Control