Guessing right for the next war: streamlining, pooling, and right-timing force design decisions for an environment of uncertainty

Abstract

Streamlining, pooling, and task organization have formed key ingredients for not only how the Army fought World War II, but also how it continues to organize today. In essence, streamlining pares down every unit to its essentials based around a single critical capability it provides to the combined arms team. The capabilities taken away are then pooled into formations of like type. In combat, then, the commanders on the ground can task organize those resources together based upon the environment, conditions, and enemy presented to them. The genius of this conceptual mix, the combination of streamlining, pooling, and task organization, stems from the ability to avoid committing to one force design solution to modern combat. This mix allowed the Army to wait until combat experience taught Army leaders to understand its demands. The Army after World War II shied away from temporary organizational systems like these in favor of the mirage of the ideal self-contained combat unit. Current Army forces use streamlining and pooling for many of the same reasons the Army did during World War II. Other institutional reasons to pool forces have crept into the force design process. These institutional requirements for force structure impose pooling on the Army in ways that it might not choose and may be limiting Army effectiveness and efficiency. In response to these limitations imposed on Army efficiency and effectiveness, this monograph proposes the idea of an Army task force framework can allow the Army to build around fundamental Army capabilities. Much like the Marine Corps' Marine Air-Ground Task Force, an equivalent Army task force would have components representing each of the five key attributes of Army forces: maneuver, fires, aviation, sustainment, and command. Such a structure obviates much of the negatives of using streamlining, pooling, and task organization while retaining its most important feature: adaptability.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
May 25, 2017
Accession Number
AD1038976

Entities

People

  • Noah A. Emery-morris

Organizations

  • School of Advanced Military Studies

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms
  • Human Systems
  • Space

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Air Defense
  • Air Power
  • Artillery
  • Artillery Units
  • Combat Forces
  • Employment
  • Indirect Fire
  • Military History
  • Military Organizations
  • Military Science
  • National Security
  • Organizational Structure
  • Second World War
  • Students
  • Task Forces
  • United States
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Aerospace logistics and air mobility.
  • Military History of the United States in the 20th Century.
  • Team-Based Human-Centered Cognitive Task Decision Making and Information Performance.