No Evidence for an Item Limit in Change Detection (Open Access)

Abstract

Change detection is a classic paradigm that has been used for decades to argue that working memory can hold no more than a fixed number of items (item-limit models). Recent findings force us to consider the alternative view that working memory is limited by the precision in stimulus encoding, with mean precision decreasing with increasing set size(continuous-resource models). Most previous studies that used the change detection paradigm have ignored effects of limited encoding precision by using highly discriminable stimuli and only large changes. We conducted two change detection experiments (orientation and color) in which change magnitudes were drawn from a wide range, including small changes. In a rigorous comparison of five models, we found no evidence of an item limit. Instead, human change detection performance was best explained by a continuous-resource model in which encoding precision is variable across items and trials even at a given set size. This model accounts for comparison errors in a principled, probabilistic manner. Our findings sharply challenge the theoretical basis for most neural studies of working memory capacity.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Feb 28, 2013
Accession Number
AD1042145

Entities

People

  • Ronald Van Den Berg
  • Shaiyan Keshvari
  • Wei J. Ma

Organizations

  • Baylor College of Medicine

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Human Systems

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Bayesian Inference
  • Bayesian Networks
  • Change Detection
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Biology
  • Computational Science
  • Detection
  • False Alarms
  • Information Science
  • Measurement
  • Models
  • Neural Networks
  • Observers
  • Orientation (Direction)
  • Probability
  • Standards
  • United States

Readers

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Regression Analysis.
  • Sensor Fusion and Tracking Systems.