US Policy on the South China Sea: Should the US Make Adjustments Following the Permanent Court of Arbitration Ruling

Abstract

US Policy on the South China Sea: should the United States make adjustments following the Permanent Court of Arbitration Ruling? In July 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague ruled against the Peoples Republic of China on several South China Sea (SCS) disputes providing the Government of the Philippines, and international community, a diplomatic tool to counter Chinese encroachment in the Philippines exclusive economic zone and more broadly in the SCS. This paper presents background on US and Philippines policy on the SCS and the key elements of the PCA award. The paper will then argue that a shift in US policy to a more pro-Philippine position is required to enable US action and better support US and Philippine interests in the region. A counterargument shows that some scholars feel the status quo US policy is adequate for strategic US interests. Finally, the paper draws conclusions and provides recommendations for US policy to support US interests in the SCS.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Oct 26, 2017
Accession Number
AD1047819

Entities

People

  • Michael Root

Organizations

  • Naval War College

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Air Platforms
  • C4I
  • Energy and Power Technologies
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Agreements
  • Arbitration
  • Coast Guard
  • Determinants (Mathematics)
  • Governments
  • Gray Zone
  • International Law
  • Islands
  • Law
  • Law Enforcement
  • National Security
  • Navies (Foreign)
  • New York
  • Oceans
  • South China Sea
  • Treaties
  • United States

Readers

  • Criminal Law
  • East Asian Political and Security Studies within the Soviet Union
  • Strategic Security Studies