Improving Training Officer Job Fit: A Qualitative and Cost Analysis

Abstract

Within the Surface Warfare community, the U.S. Navy has significant retention problems, which have been ward off by drastic bonuses paid to its officers. A phone survey of training officers (TRAINOs) aboard cruisers and destroyers was conducted, resulting in a 40 percent participation rate from the population. Only 30.3 percent selected the TRAINO billet as their number one billet choice, and 55.7 percent planned on getting out of the Navy. A majority felt the training received was inadequate. This led us to conduct a cost-benefit analysis, with three courses of action (COA). First, the status quo shows no impact on costs or added benefits. COA 2, adding an additional TRAINO billet to be filled by a Human Resources (HR) Officer, increased costs by $600,837 per month while COA 3, swapping an HR Officer into the surface warfare officer (SWO) TRAINO billet, increased costs by $21,829 per month. There were significant non-monetary benefits to both COA 2 and 3, including increases in training proficiency and in job fit for both the HR and SWO communities. These non-monetary benefits were most significant in COA 2, resulting in adding an HR Officer to CRUDES platforms being the most beneficial COA.

Open PDF

Document Details

Document Type
Technical Report
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2018
Accession Number
AD1052765

Entities

People

  • Kyle J. Lupo
  • Lucas M. Groves

Organizations

  • Naval Postgraduate School

Tags

Communities of Interest

  • Biomedical
  • Ground and Sea Platforms

DTIC Thesaurus Topics

  • Communities
  • Cost Analysis
  • Cost Benefit Analysis
  • Costs
  • Data Analysis
  • Human Resources
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Navy
  • Personnel Management
  • Reserve Officer Training Corps
  • Schools
  • Ships
  • Surface Warfare
  • Training
  • United States
  • United States Naval Academy
  • Warfare

Readers

  • Industrial Economics
  • Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • Military Leadership and Professional Education.